Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Inactive Member NotSoSilentBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2nd, 2002
    Posts
    8,067
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    A Debate "Moderator" In the Tank for Obama
    by Michelle Malkin

    My dictionary defines "moderator" as "the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting." On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.

    But there is nothing "moderate" about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She's so far in the tank for the Democratic presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.

    In an imaginary world where liberal journalists are held to the same standards as everyone else, Ifill would be required to make a full disclosure at the start of the debate. She would be required to turn to the cameras and tell the national audience that she has a book coming out on Jan. 20, 2009 -- a date that just happens to coincide with the inauguration of the next president of the United States.

    The title of Ifill's book? "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama." Nonpartisan my foot.

    Random House, her publisher, is already busy hyping the book with YouTube clips of Ifill heaping praise on her subjects, including Obama and Obama-endorsing Mass. Gov. Deval Patrick. The official promo for the book gushes:

    "In 'The Breakthrough,' veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama's stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power. ... Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Sen. Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the 'black enough' conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history."

    Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely declared this the "Age of Obama." Can you imagine a right-leaning journalist writing a book about the "stunning" McCain campaign and its "bold" path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day -- and then expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation's sole vice presidential debate?

    Yeah, I just registered 6.4 on the Snicker Richter Scale, too.

    Despite the protestations of her colleagues that she will be fair, Ifill has appeared on numerous radio and TV talk shows over the past several months to cash in on her access to the Obama campaign. She recently penned a fawning cover story on the Obamas for Essence magazine that earned much buzz. The title? "The Obamas: Portrait of an American Family." A sample of Ifill's hard-hitting investigative journalism, illustrated with Kennedy-esque photos of the Obamas and children posing at home on the back porch and by the piano:

    "Barack Obama is sitting in the back of his rented luxury campaign bus with its granite counters and two flat-screen TVs. The Illinois senator's arms are wrapped around his wife, Michelle, whom he doesn't get to see much these days. At this very moment he is, of all things, singing."

    During the Democratic National Convention, Ifill offered her neutral analysis on NBC News before Michelle Obama's speech: "A lot of people have never seen anything that looks like a Michelle Obama before. She's educated, she's beautiful, she's tall, she tells you what she thinks and they hope that she can tell a story about Barack Obama and about herself."

    During the Republican National Convention, the PBS ombudsman fielded numerous complaints about Ifill's coverage of Sarah Palin's speech. Wrote Brian Meyers of Granby, Ct.:

    "I was appalled by Gwen Ifill's commentary directly following Gov. Sarah Palin's speech. Her attitude was dismissive and the look on her face was one of disgust. Clearly, she was agitated by what most critics view as a well-delivered speech. It is quite obvious that Ms. Ifill supports Obama as she struggled to say anything redemptive about Gov. Palin's performance. I am disappointed in Ms. Ifill's complete disregard for journalistic objectivity."

    Like Obama, Ifill, who is black, is quick to play the race card at the first sign of criticism. In an interview with the Washington Post a few weeks ago, she carped: "[N]o one's ever assumed a white reporter can't cover a white candidate."

    It's not the color of your skin, sweetie. It's the color of your politics. Perhaps Ifill will be able to conceal it this week. But if the "stunning" "Breakthrough" she's rooting for comes to pass on Jan. 20, 2009, nobody will be fooled.

    http://townhall.com/columnists/Miche...tank_for_obama
    [IMG]http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l53/blpjr77/culpeper1.jpg[/IMG]

  2. #2
    Inactive Member CoeburnCane's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 24th, 2004
    Posts
    4,931
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"In 'The Breakthrough,' veteran journalist Gwen Ifill surveys the American political landscape, shedding new light on the impact of Barack Obama's stunning presidential campaign and introducing the emerging young African American politicians forging a bold new path to political power. ... Drawing on interviews with power brokers like Sen. Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell, Vernon Jordan, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and many others, as well as her own razor-sharp observations and analysis of such issues as generational conflict and the 'black enough' conundrum, Ifill shows why this is a pivotal moment in American history."

    Ifill and her publisher are banking on an Obama/Biden win to buoy her book sales. The moderator expected to treat both sides fairly has grandiosely declared this the "Age of Obama." Can you imagine a right-leaning journalist writing a book about the "stunning" McCain campaign and its "bold" path to reform timed for release on Inauguration Day -- and then expecting a slot as a moderator for the nation's sole vice presidential debate? </div></div>

    I snickered at this for quite a different reason--didn't they teach reading comprehension to Mrs. Malkin?

    The title reads "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama". That's not "proclaiming" it the Age of Obama, that's a time stamp that lets you know the focus of the book--nothing more. According to what I've read in that article and reviews I've read on the book, it's not about how Obama's going to take over the world, it's about how Obama's making more headway than any other African-American politician before him, as evidenced by him winning the Democratic nomination.

    Nothing partisan about that--the subject matter is a study in race as it relates to today's political landscape. And she's an African-American woman, so it makes sense that she'd write something of that nature. Does she want Ifill to apologize for being African-American or what?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Despite the protestations of her colleagues that she will be fair, Ifill has appeared on numerous radio and TV talk shows over the past several months to cash in on her access to the Obama campaign. She recently penned a fawning cover story on the Obamas for Essence magazine that earned much buzz. The title? "The Obamas: Portrait of an American Family." A sample of Ifill's hard-hitting investigative journalism, illustrated with Kennedy-esque photos of the Obamas and children posing at home on the back porch and by the piano:

    "Barack Obama is sitting in the back of his rented luxury campaign bus with its granite counters and two flat-screen TVs. The Illinois senator's arms are wrapped around his wife, Michelle, whom he doesn't get to see much these days. At this very moment he is, of all things, singing."</div></div>

    Once again--though romanticized somewhat, this is a perspective on Obama's family. Malkin should know by now that McCain & Obama have both stated that family is an off-limits thing as far as attacks and criticism goes...but yet Malkin's going there?

    Guess what Michelle--Essence is a magazine geared toward the African-American community--so thusly, that would be a "portrait of an American family" as it applies to African-Americans. The Kennedy-esque photos were taken by an Essence photographer I'd assume, and they have say as to what photos go w/which article. If there's a complaint about that, talk to Essence--not Ifill.

    Folks...Malkin is the same journalist that's been called by conservatives and liberals alike the nickname "The Asian Ann Coulter". She's guest-hosted "The O'Reilly Factor" several times in Bill's absence--where it's taken a decidedly more conservative slant when she's hosting (yes, that's possible). We're talking about the same "journalist" that took a look at a paisley-patterned scarf worn by Rachel Ray in a Dunkin' Donuts commercial and said she translated it into something about an Islamic Jihad in Arabic...when it was merely a patterned scarf picked out by a stylist for the commercial. DD pulled the commercial as a precaution.

    Great non-partisan source material, here.
    [U][COLOR=#22229c][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/miami-med.gif[/IMG][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/nohokie-med.gif[/IMG][/COLOR][/U]
    [U][COLOR=#22229c][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/Funny/owmyballs.gif[/IMG][/COLOR][/U]

  3. #3
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    Starting a little early on the excuses are we?

  4. #4
    Inactive Member CoeburnCane's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 24th, 2004
    Posts
    4,931
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200...politico/22784

    McCain: 'Gwen Ifill is a professional'
    by Michael Calderone

    Fox's Carl Cameron asked John McCain today if he thought that PBS journalist Gwen Ifill should recuse herself from moderating Thursday's VP debate in St. Louis.

    "I think that Gwen Ifill is a professional, and I think she will do a totally objective job because she is a highly-respected professional," McCain said.

    "Does this help that if she has written a book that's favorable to Sen. Obama?" McCain asked. "Probably not."

    There's been an uproar today over Ifill's forthcoming book, "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama."? As I mentioned earlier, it's been known that the book's been in the works for a while, but has just gained traction now, primarily through conservative websites, cable news, and talk radio.

    On the air today, Rush Limbaugh said Ifill was " totally in the tank for Obama."

    "This is a conflict of interest,"? Limbaugh said. "She has a financial stake in Obama winning the race."

    Next, Limbaugh played a clip from McCain being asked on another radio show whether he thinks Ifill should be moderator.

    "I don't make that judgment,"? McCain said. "I am confident that Gwen Ifill, or whoever is the moderator, would be fair."?

    McCain said he "had not heard about a new book or anything else,"? but added that Ifill would be "scrupulously fair."?
    [U][COLOR=#22229c][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/miami-med.gif[/IMG][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/nohokie-med.gif[/IMG][/COLOR][/U]
    [U][COLOR=#22229c][IMG]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/btketron/Funny/owmyballs.gif[/IMG][/COLOR][/U]

  5. #5
    Inactive Member NotSoSilentBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2nd, 2002
    Posts
    8,067
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    Yep, McCain is full of [censored] and too worried about stepping on toes. He should call a spade a spade and call out the debate committee for this bullshit.

    I can't imagine the outcry if the author of a book titled 'McCain - The Story of a Maverick' (or something of the sort) were chosen to moderate a presidential debate.

    You know, neutrality and all that...
    [IMG]http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l53/blpjr77/culpeper1.jpg[/IMG]

  6. #6
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?

    <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NotSoSilentBob</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yep, McCain is full of [censored] and too worried about stepping on toes. He should call a spade a spade and call out the debate committee for this bullshit.

    I can't imagine the outcry if the author of a book titled 'McCain - The Story of a Maverick' (or something of the sort) were chosen to moderate a presidential debate.

    You know, neutrality and all that... </div></div>

    Mccain hasnt been too worried about stepping on toes during the race, so why start now?

    The name of her book is "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama." Not like you are making it out to be with the 'McCain - The Story of a Maverick'. That Obama bit about his family wasnt a book it was a cover story for Essence. The book has been talked about since July and she was picked to be Mod in August wasnt it? It was no secret and Mccain should have said something about it then, guess he hadnt picked his idiotic VP yet. He even said she was fine and would do a good job, looks like the only ones bitching about is you and Limpballs. These pre-excuses wont Palin anygood tonight. Her expectations are so low that if she gives a direct answer to "What her favorite colors is?" will be a win for her. Which I sure if she shows the slightest bit of intelligence you and Fox will be claiming victory. Doubt she will though, though I will be able to use some of answers in the JOTD thread. Cant wait to hear these one-liners she will try to use to weasel her way around a question.

  7. #7
    Inactive Member NotSoSilentBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 2nd, 2002
    Posts
    8,067
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Shouldn't a moderator at least be somewhat impartial?


    I just don't think it is appropriate for her to be a moderator if she stands to benefit financially from an Obama victory, and right now she stands to benefit financially if he wins.
    [IMG]http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l53/blpjr77/culpeper1.jpg[/IMG]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •